Learning

Grant Writing Training

A practical program for building funder-oriented applications.

Why this matters now

We train grant writers the way we train our own — with the actual logic that evaluators score against, with funder-by-funder calibration, and with practice on real, live applications rather than fabricated cases. Participants leave with a method, not a folder of slides.

What this includes

Funder logic

How EU, USAID, Sida, FCDO, UN agencies, foundations, and corporate funders actually score — what wins, what loses.

Application architecture

Theory of change, work packages, partner architecture, budget logic, narrative consistency.

Real applications

Participants bring an active or planned application; we work with that, not with case studies.

QA discipline

The simulated-evaluator review pass that makes the difference between a 65 and an 85 score.

What you receive

Curriculum

Certified instructor, workbooks, evaluator-style scoring rubrics.

Real applications

Each participant leaves with at least one application moved measurably forward.

Method document

The participant's own grant-writing method, written down.

QA record

Documented evaluator-style review of each participant's application.

How we work

Pre-work

Two weeks. Participant applications mapped; curriculum tailored.

Modules

Five to six modules across six weeks.

QA cycle

Two weeks. Evaluator-style review and rewrite.

Submission

Participants submit during or shortly after the programme.

Indicators of success

Win rate

Higher win rate on the applications written during the programme.

Architecture

Participants apply the method to subsequent applications without re-training.

Funder match

Selection improves — fewer wasted applications.

Internal capability

The host organisation has a credible grant-writing function at programme end.

Common questions

Do you certify?

Working-session certification with documented evaluator-style assessment. Not a third-party certification — those exist separately, and we point participants to them.

Can you train one person?

Single-person engagements are coaching, not training — we offer that as a separate format.

Languages?

English and Ukrainian; Russian on request.

Discuss the next step

Describe the task, deadline and context. We will suggest the first practical route.