Evaluation

NGO Evaluation

Evaluate projects or organizational capacity with practical, evidence-based recommendations.

Why this matters now

Evaluation in the NGO sector is too often theatre — a report that satisfies a grant clause and is read by no one. We do evaluation as decision support: a clear question, a defensible method, an honest finding, and a recommendation set the organisation can act on. The donor accepts the report; the executive director uses it; the next grant is stronger because of it.

What this includes

Scoping

The decision the evaluation is meant to inform, the questions, the OECD-DAC criteria in scope, the methods that fit.

Method

Mixed methods — document review, structured interviews, beneficiary surveys, financial review, contextual data — sized to the budget.

Fieldwork

On the ground, structured, with a real sample. We use ethics protocols and informed consent throughout.

Reporting

The findings, the evidence, the recommendations, and a separate management response plan — the part most evaluations skip.

What you receive

Inception report

Question, method, sample, ethics, calendar — agreed with the donor and the organisation before fieldwork.

Evidence file

Interview notes, survey data, financial extracts, observation logs — auditable on request.

Final report

Findings against OECD-DAC criteria — relevance, coherence, effectiveness, efficiency, impact, sustainability — with prioritised recommendations.

Management response plan

What the organisation will do with the recommendations, by when, owned by whom.

Method visualisation · OECD-DAC Evaluation Criteria
OECD-DAC EVALUATION CRITERIA Applied to all Paragraf evaluation engagements Relevance Is this the right intervention? Coherence Does it fit with other efforts? Effectiveness Are objectives being achieved? Efficiency Are resources used well? Impact What significant difference was made? Sustainability Will the results continue over time?

All six criteria are assessed with mixed methods: document review, key informant interviews, field observation, and participatory workshops.

How we work

Inception

Three weeks. Question, method, sample, ethics, kickoff with donor and team.

Fieldwork

Four to eight weeks. Interviews, surveys, document and finance review, observation.

Analysis and reporting

Three to four weeks. Draft, review, finalisation.

Management response

Two weeks. Workshop with the executive team to convert findings into action.

Indicators of success

Donor accepts

Without rework. The evaluation file is ready for the donor's audit chain.

Findings used

The management response plan is delivered against — not just written.

Programme strengthened

Subsequent programmes show evidence of the evaluation's recommendations being acted on.

Integrity

No conflict of interest. The evaluator's seat is independent of the funded programme team.

Common questions

Do you do summative or formative evaluation?

Both. We default to formative when the programme is mid-cycle and summative at end of programme — but we let the decision the evaluation is meant to inform decide.

Can you evaluate ourselves and our programme?

Yes. We use external evaluators and a documented independence protocol; we will refuse engagements where independence cannot be defended.

How much does this cost?

Cost scales with sample size and geography, not narrative complexity. We give a written budget after the scoping conversation.

Discuss the next step

Describe the task, deadline and context. We will suggest the first practical route.